Christine Blasey Ford’s DARK Secret Finally Comes Out

You Might Like

Here’s why she tried to ruin Brett Kavanaugh’s life…

The woman who accused Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a teenage party has now had her motivation revealed.

The Daily Caller obtained footage of the attorney for Christine Blasey Ford and what she revealed was what many had suspected.

Debra Katz, the attorney for Blasey Ford, said that she is thrilled that Justice Kavanaugh will have an “asterisk by his name” when he “takes a scalpel” to Roe V Wade.

“In the aftermath of these hearings, I believe that Christine’s testimony brought about more good than the harm misogynist Republicans caused by allowing Kavanaugh on the court,” she said.

“He will always have an asterisk next to his name,” she said in the video first reported in Ryan Lovelace’s new book, “Search and Destroy: Inside the Campaign Against Brett Kavanaugh.”

“When he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is, we know his character, and we know what motivates him, and that is important; it is important that we know, and that is part of what motivated Christine,” she said.

“A lot of people ask if Christine Blasey Ford was lying,” Lovelace said in an interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“To know that, you have to know her motivation,” he said. “Since she has not talked to me directly, the best way I can understand what she is thinking is by what her lawyer is saying.

“And her lawyer says that she is motivated, at least in part, by Roe v. Wade protecting legalized abortion,” he said.

“I think if we knew in September what we know now, there would have been all kinds of questions at the hearing about this,” he said.

“I want people to look for themselves and to understand for themselves,” the author said in his interview with the DCNF.

In his book he spoke about the motivation of Blasey Ford and how what her attorney said contradicts what she said.

“Before the confirmation, Ford had maintained that she came forward out of a sense of civic duty to provide information that she thought senators needed to know before voting on Kavanaugh,” he said in his book.

“We must ponder the very real possibility that had Dr. Ford not come from the same background, and the same race, and the same class, and the same country club as Brett Kavanaugh, had she not had an impeccable academic record, and stellar professional credentials, if she was not on the faculty of Stanford with 70 publications to her name, if she wasn’t married to a man with two children, would she have been given the opportunity?” he said.

Src: The Federalist Papers

You Might Like
[ssba]